The above poster details perhaps one of the greatest fantasies of yore as it has been heavily Hollywoodized. The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian is one of the many movies I like to call flipsides: you either like it or don't like, there is no middleground.Why would avid fans of the books not like an adaptation of one of the most beloved of the Chronicles? Perhaps because after the success of the first movie, Andrew Adamson thought to take some creative license.
Now, Prince Caspian isn't necessarily a bad movie - rather, it's a movie which speaks for itself and not for the book it has adapted from. Prince Caspian is a movie all its own, and saying 'I read the book so there's not really a point watching the movie' would be a poor excuse to miss out on this potpourri of genres.
Some would say that Prince Caspian doesn't follow the book. However, I declare that Prince Caspian follows the book so well that it is left with plenty of room to add on to that particular cornerstone. It addresses a modern day audience, bringing a few cringeable scenes including a distasteful Susan/Caspian romance, but for the most part it brings messages regarding emotions and problems the Pevensie children would likely be facing. We see the result of Peter's pride in the respect that he doesn't want to wait for Aslan - after an ill-fated attack on the castle, dozens of fighters are slain, left behind with no means of escape.
Though some of the creative license taken by Disney leaves people cringing in their seats, most of it pays off in the long run. Andrew Adamson's gamble has paid off, and saying 'It doesn't follow the book' is justifiable by the fact that though we may have departed from C.S. Lewis's portrayal of the stiffly heroic Peter and other aspects made for a short children's book, we have gained many more life lessons, one of them being that our pride doesn't just hurt us. I feel a tingle of anticipation as I wonder about what Disney will bring us in the Voyage of the Dawn Treader.
Indeed, C.S. Lewis's legacy lives on.

